You searched for:
Label: Grundy, Wilts., I

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    Grundy, Wilts., I. Grundy, G. B., 'The Saxon Land Charters of Wiltshire', Archaeological Journal 2nd series 26 (1919), 143–301. 61 charters cited.

    • S 67. Comments, rejects identification with Dilton, Wilts., p. 150
    • S 229. Comments, second part of boundary clause describes Bishopstone and Stratford Tory, pp. 145-8
    • S 264. Comments, on bounds, pp. 151-5
    • S 272. Comments, on bounds, pp. 159-64
    • S 275. Comments, on bounds, p. 149
    • S 308. Comments, probably refers to Hardenhuish, Wilts., but no landmarks can be positively identified, pp. 170-1
    • S 312. Comments, pp. 172-80
    • S 326. Comments, refers to Teffont Evias, pp. 181-3
    • S 329. Comments, fails to identify estate, not Donhead, pp. 180-1
    • S 336. Comments, bounds describe whole of Buttermere and parts of Linkenholt and Vernham Dean, Hants, pp. 183-7
    • S 348. Comments, on bounds, pp. 187-91
    • S 362. Comments, bounds describe Stockton, pp. 197-200
    • S 364. Comments, bounds describe Fovant and Sutton Mandeville, pp. 191-7
    • S 366. Comments, bounds describe Badbury in Chisledon, pp. 200-5
    • S 368. Comments, on bounds, pp. 210-15
    • S 379. Comments, on bounds, pp. 216-21
    • S 393. Comments, on bounds, pp. 149-50
    • S 416. Comments, on bounds, pp. 224-8
    • S 424. Comments, on bounds, pp. 187-91
    • S 427. Comments, bounds difficult to locate, pp. 228-34
    • S 438. Comments, bounds describe part of the lands of Burcombe Without lying south of the Nadder, pp. 234-6
    • S 449. Comments, bounds difficult to locate, pp. 240-7
    • S 466. Comments, on bounds, pp. 255-9
    • S 468. Comments, pp. 259-61
    • S 469. Comments, bounds describe the part of Wylye south of river Wylye, with an appendage relating to part of Baverstock, pp. 261-5, 266-8
    • S 470. Comments, on bounds, pp. 247-51
    • S 472. Comments, on bounds, survey is of post-Conquest date, pp. 251-3
    • S 473. Comments, bounds may describe Langley Burrell, but are difficult to locate, pp. 253-5
    • S 478. Comments, on bounds, pp. 269-71
    • S 486. Comments, on bounds, pp. 283-8
    • S 492. Comments, on bounds, pp. 271-4, 276-8
    • S 493. Comments, bounds probably refer to part of the lands of Wilton lying south of the Nadder, perhaps excluding Bulbridge, pp. 288-9
    • S 504. Comments, on bounds, pp. 295-6
    • S 522. Comments, bounds are those of Bishopstone, pp. 296-8
    • S 540. Comments, on bounds, cf. S 229, p. 150
    • S 547. Comments, probably not Overton, Wilts., or Overton, Hants, p. 247
    • S 568. Comments, bounds cover parish of Chisledon, including Badbury, pp. 205-10
    • S 586. Comments, bounds probably describe south-western part of modern parish of Wilton, pp. 293-5
    • S 612. Comments, bounds are those of Little Langford, pp. 282-3
    • S 631. Comments, bounds describe part of Burcombe, pp. 236-8
    • S 640. Comments, bounds describe lands of Bishopstone, pp. 298-9
    • S 647. Comments, same bounds in S 685, pp. 210-15
    • S 676. Comments, not in Wilts, p. 228
    • S 685. Comments, bounds identical with those in S 647, pp. 210-15
    • S 705. Comments, on bounds, pp. 283-8
    • S 763. Comments, on bounds, pp. 283-8
    • S 766. Comments, on bounds of Baverstock and South Newton, pp. 268-9, 274-6
    • S 784. Comments, on bounds, pp. 245-7
    • S 831. Comments, bounds describe the part of Wylye lying north of the river, pp. 265-6
    • S 870. Comments, on bounds, p. 289
    • S 881. Comments, bounds describe Fovant and Stoke Mandeville, pp. 191-7
    • S 891. Comments, on bounds, cf. S 229, p. 150
    • S 918. Comments, on bounds, pp. 284-8
    • S 1010. Comments, on bounds, pp. 290-2
    • S 1513. Comments, bounds describe at least part of the later parish of Alton Priors, pp. 159-64
    • S 1575. Comments, describes the northen part of the lands of Bremhill (i.e. Avon, Foxham and Kellaways in Bremhill), pp. 238-40
    • S 1580. Comments, pp. 165-9
    • S 1585. Comments, pp. 221-3
    • S 1586. Comments, survey probably does not include Purton Stoke, pp. 155-9
    • S 1588. Comments, pp. 172-80
    • S 1811. Comments, pp. 278-82